|
Hail,
Very well put Haggis. I concur with the above posts. I am Folkish, and I dispise the New Age Granola Chewing group hug mentality of what passes as a male role modle now days. We in teh Western european tradition in my opinion, have been corrupted by the advent of the 60's movements that lead to men showing a female side, and sex roles being turned upside down. I Believe the Chrsitian Church with it's conecpt of Turn the Other Cheek, and the Meek Inheriting the Earth, were direct assualts on the old warrior cultures of our ancestors. The Christian Church waged a 1000 year war, (and even now) to erradicate our Northern European Warrior tradition and Culture. The Advent of the 1960's saw cultural movements that further went on to emasculate the male warrior tradition and role model.
The rise of the effeminite man as the man who is in tocuh with his female side and the sensitive male as ideal, was highly advanced in the 1960's peace movement. It came with it's own religious movement that gave birth to our modern New Age Movement.
I do not have any problems with someone who follows the Hindu tradition, for we should note our ancestors invaded into India bringing a variant of the Gods we worship in our tradition, the chariot, and a caste system that reverered preistly classes, and Warriors as the foremost castes, then merchants. In fact the early Proto European Religion that came out of the Black Sea region also had a class of warriors not only seperate from the rest of society, they were mostly symbolized by Wolves, and later the Bear. The Hindu gods and ours are cousins, but the New Age movement is not about keeping true to an historical tradition, but creating a new one from any path you choose.
For the moment, let us consider one of the 60's mantra's that wwas popular: "Real men Cry"
It goes without saying all shed tears, but the movement sought to create a male class of sensitive effinite males that a rising feminist movement could view as "Safe" males. The entire cultural movement of the 60's was geared at Anti-War in and establishment in general, and that Anti-war slant would include getting rid of guns, real or toys, and teaching crafting young boys to grow into a sensitive non threatening role.
While It should be noted that all men have a sensitive side, I do not concur with this train of thought that we should emasculate males to create a class of men who disdain the warrior code and culture. It was a part of the movement in the 60's that the ideal man should be sensitive and non threatening, it was pushed further by religious or quasi religious gurus that taught there was no place in the world for war or warriors.
This is the root of both issues you raise. While no one would ever say that homosexuality did not exist in the past, nore among warrior calsses (Case in point: Sparta and ancient Greece) I would argue that I believe it is against nature to do so. Even a horse and a donkey can mate and produce a mule, but I have yet to see two males that can produce an offspring. That alone to me points to the fact it is against our true nature. What some one else may do, I believe is on them if there are negative consequences, but I personally do not feel Homosexuality is accpetable in the natural scheme. Others may feel differently, but I believe this is a personal conviction all must look at within themselves.
I have a maxim: Leave me, my wife, my kids, and my pets alone sexually, and you may do as you wish, However: I do not have to accept waht one does as acceptable or natural. For myself this is easy. I know what I believe is naturla and correct by nature. Others can do as they wish. i will walk the path I know to be right for me.
As to the New Age movement, I do believe there are many well wishing and honest folks in that movement, but feel they are wasting their time and efforts in a pie int eh sky ala carte spiritual movent full of charlatans and money making authors, at the expense of honoring time honored spiritual paths. I had been a member of that movement when I was young and walked out of Christianity knowing there had to be more...
Within the movement we see corrupted traditions from Cletic, Norse, Hindu (or any other group you wish to choose ala carte to include) combined with esoteric practices from once a agian any other group you wish to include as a path for those who walk it. Most of the things they take from our tradition or others, are corrupted, or altered. The key of the New Age spiritual movement is you can believe anything you wish and every thing you take as you choose is right, even if it is not soundly based in any historical tradition, or you can fabricate your own belief system. Spiritualy, an ala carte pick and choose is the rule of law.
Where I get even more upset about this movement is they present their views of altered spiritual paths, and reinvent our traditions in their own views ignoring our traditions. They corrupt our beliefs as somehow universal pie in the sky practices to include wicca, or whatever practice like Reike or other traditions, package as NORSE, or CELTIC, and sell it to the mindless masses as the TRUE path.
Sadly I know there are many lost and wandering people spiritually out of touch with their heritage and ancestral gods, who will latch onto anything in the hope they have found the true way. The many lecturers and authors in teh movement have made a multimillion dollar (Or whatever currency is in use in their home country) Franchise over this. There are group retreats where one can pay hundereds of Dollars to go for a weekend to hear a lecturer or learn to channel some spirit. In this group you will find many charlatans trying to turn a buck.
Mind you, we see charlatans in every faith, and as noted, some of these people are well intentioned, but I would argue severly misguided. I prefer to keep my traditional practices as pure as possible, if I am practicing Odinism, or a Cletic rite, as I am of both heritages. I do not need an ancient chinese spirtual master, or a member fo the arcturian star command to guide my rites, practices, or aid me in understanding Odin and our Pantheon. There are new age groups that will advance that type of thought, or argue that Odin was some member of a star fleet of higher angels from some planet that oversees us.
Our lore is very explicit as to who our gods are, and from our lore we see our spiritual practices and teachings. The Havamal for instance is as it is, we do not need an angel of the star command to refine it.
I concur with you brother on the concepts you present. Our Gods are our folk. Our faith is quite clear as to who our Gods are, and ou rites are time honored, and not influenced by modern magic and spiritualism from the 1800's as are Wicca and teh New Age Movement.
It can be said though that the New Age is a misnomer or an oxymoron. There is really nothing very new in this movement other than the ala carte style acceptance of every spiritual practice available and or any new variant as acceptable. The basis to most of their beliefs are on very ancient beliefs world wide thrown in a bag, shaken up, and pulled out wrapped and packaged in anyway they wish.
Others will have other opinions on the issues of homosexuality as a morally right or wrong issue, or as natural. Others may also not be folkish as to our gods being for our folk, and people of other heritages having the need to seek their ancestral gods. I view our gods as for our folk, and relationships based on the natural pairing of male and female.
We may look at the tale of Loki changing into a Mare to seduce away the giants horse in the tale of teh building of the wall of Asgard as a possible note of transgendered or a teaching of homosexual relationships. While that union did produce one of Odins greatest gifts, Sleipner, to get it, Loki had to change his sex, and mate with an animal of his own gender. He not only turned against his gender, he had sexual realtions with a male. Some may say that union was a wonderful thing for it produced Sleipner, but it could be argued that in betraying his gender and engaging in that act, he was punished by conceiving and giving birth. From that birth Odin extracted a positive thing, but at the expence of Loki's defying his gender having inercourse with his natural gender (Even though while in the guise of a female)
All of this could be subject to many understandings, but I do not condemn those who walk in path, or orientation, I howver do not see it as natural or justified in our lore. I believe that men should be raised from young boys and initiated into the culture of the warrior. That the codes and teachings of teh path of the warrior breed men of reknown. The 60's effeminite man, while caring and perhaps we can say sexually placed in a reveresed psychological role, was reared to disdain the warrior path. While it may work for these men, and the many well meaning men of that movement, I see that as the modern assault on the warrior culture.
Let us take our adolescent boys and let them go throguh warrior rites of passage to be considered men. Let us take the spear and dance by the fire, let us engage in martial contests and train as warriors, for these things are of our historical religious culture. The granola eating, group hugging guy, who talks to his St. Germain the New Age Avater, or Star Command of Arturius, peace and taking guns way, has his place: But Not in the warrior circle. Pardon my thoughts on this, but he may fit the sewing circle or the tea club better, but if such is his choice I wish him well. We who walk the path can serve our gods better as we do. Whatever the role of teh New Age non-warrior male, or his orientation, I will let our Gods sort out their place. I know mine. That is what we should uphold foremost: Our warrior path and our Dedication to our gods. While I hope all may awake to Odins path who have not, We can only know, some will not. Our path then is to wlak as a warrior for our folk as our most imporant duty.
These are only my thoughts.
_________________ Brother Hrafnulfr
"May Odin grant you a glorious end, and may we feast together in Valhalla!"
|